First I will show you some contradictions introduced in the books of the Apology, and Crito and explain them. Next, I will explain how in the present day Socrates philosophy is false due to the vices of mankind, with evidence from the Apology, then I will show you how Socrates might argue his point and a counter argument in present. In the Apology, Socrates is faced with a death sentence at the hands of the state, but ironically is unapologetic in his discourse while defending himself. The Crito, however, displays Socrates in a dialogue where he chooses to engage and characterize the laws as a means of arguing for his faithfulness to the decision of the polis. Indeed, he uses the laws as a rhetorical device. He first contradicts himself when he gets approached by Meletus, then he does it again during his court hearing, and he does it one last time when the jury to choose a punishment.
Essay on Crito by Plato
Essay on Crito by Plato - Words | Bartleby
If he had not carried out his sentence, then justice would not have served. This would contradict his teachings and his actions. Even though Socrates opposed democracy, he went through with his punishment; death by poison. If he was really anti-democracy, he would have never agreed to a trial. Socrates argument In the apology book Socrates have many accusers. Now he is accused of corrupting the youth but He is denying the allegations he is saying that he could not intentionally corrupt anyone. Some people are convinced that he is speaking the truth but some people thing that he is lying.
Plato's The Crito Essay
Please join StudyMode to read the full document. After the false accusations in the Apology, Socrates is imprisoned for being wrongly tried and condemned to death, later on he is greeted by Crito his friend who visits in the cell with him. Crito tries to convince him through compelling, but at times selfish arguments. Socrates responds against these arguments with selfless reasons to explain the bigger issue of his own principles.
In the setting of the dialogue, Socrates has been condemned to die, and Crito comes with both the hopes and the means for Socrates to escape from prison. When Socrates insists that they should examine whether he should escape or not, the central question turns into whether if it is unjust to disobey laws. However, the examination in Crito was incompletely and its logic flawed; in making this decision, Socrates has forsaken his life for his ideal of justice.